SEARCH UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES WEBSITE
Prepared by Judith J. Carroll, November 1, 2002; Updated April 2018; Last Updated: July 2020
Inclusive Dates: 1932-1958
Extent: 1 cubic foot (1 record storage box)
Physical Location: 11th floor
Historical Note: Big interests clashed in Northeastern Ohio with the proposed construction of a shipping canal from the Ohio River in Pennsylania's Beaver and Lawrence counties, north through Ohio's Trumbull and Ashtabula counties, terminating in Lake Erie near Ashtabula, Ohio. The proposed canal would consist of 59 miles of canalized rivers and a land canal of 44.6 miles. This collection of engineering reports, legal briefs, hearings before the U.S. Congress, and photographs provides an outline for arguments both for and against the project.
The construction of the canal was discussed as early as the 1900's. Champions of the canal were the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and steel mills in the area, namely the Youngstown Sheet & Tube, and Republic Steel Co. The steel mills desired this canal to transport iron ore from the Great Lakes to the Youngstown steel plants. The mills were, in their opinion, forced to rely on the railroads for transportation. The canal, in their thinking, would free them from paying the high fares for iron ore delivery by the railroads from sources in Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
The main opposition to the canal project was the Upper Ohio Valley Association, "an unincorporated association with approximately 700 members, consisting, among others of steel companies, railroads, labor organizations, municipal and trade organizations, etc." The real power behind this association, providing the funds and legal expertise were the railroads. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie railroads especially played a prominent part, leading the effort against the canal.
The Grand River Reservoir was a much-opposed part of the canal project. Maps in the collection illustrate the Canal following the Beaver and Mahoning Rivers northward as far as Farmington Township in Trumbull County. At that point would begin a reservoir stretching north across Trumbull County. The planned reservoir, flowing across Ashtabula County and ending just below Ashtabula township on Lake Erie, would flood tens of thousands of acres of farmland and small towns. The last section of the canal would be constructed from the northern tip of the reservoir through Geneva Township.
Landmark events in the unborn life of this canal include the passage of the River and Harbor Act of 1935, which provided funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to study the proposed canal further. In the late 1940's the railroads provided cost estimates to alter around 80 bridges and testified before Congress regarding these estimates. The collection includes 1958 updated estimates of cost by the railroads, as the controversy and opposition to the canal continued. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recommended canal construction as late as 1965; funds were allocated in 1988 and 1994 for continued feasibility studies. In 1994 the Corps concluded that although it believed the Canal was "practical from both navigation and engineering aspects, [it] would not be economically justifiable" to build.
Scope and Content: Researchers will find clear maps and photographs of the proposed canal area, and engineering studies of water flow, created in the mid-1930's. Archival files of the railroad companies' opposition to the canal, including internal correspondence between the railroad companies and attorneys representing their interests. Some materials in the file were produced by proponents of the canal. Variant items include a few documents regarding proposed construction of the St. Lawrence Seaway, and iron ore mining in Venezuela.
Arrangement: The collection is arranged into the following series.
Acquisitions Information: Provenance of this collection is unknown. It was purchased by Kent State University's Dept. of Special Collections & Archives from Schoyer's Books, ABAA, Berkely, California, on August 6, 2002.